public comment drones flying at night public comment no one cares

No one (publicly) cares about drones flying over people, and that’s a big problem

Whenever the Federal Aviation Administration proposes new rules, there is generally a period of public comment, where regular people, drone pilots and companies can submit their opinions online.

We’re currently in one of those periods, in the wake of the FAA’s January 2019 proposed new rules that could allow drones to fly at night and over people without waivers under certain conditions.

But fewer than 100 public comments — 84 to be exact — have been submitted.

That’s a paltry figure when you consider that almost 1,300 comments have been received about safe and secure drone operations. (those proposals include possible restrictions on safe and secure drone operation, including standoff distances from drone operations, performance limits for drones, how UTM should operate, payload restrictions and critical system design requirements).

The lack of public comment on drones flying at night and over people has industry leaders nervous that the lack of interest may mean the rules are not put into place.

“We want more drone operators (both individual pilots and fleet managers) to comment, because the FAA really does pay attention to comments, but time is short,” DJI spokesperson Adam Lisberg said in an email to The Drone Girl. DJI said it also intends to submit formal comments.

The complete set of proposed rules for flying small drones over people and at night can be reviewed at this link.  The 60-day open comment period ends a week from now on Monday, April 15.

But the lack of public comment does not mean that people don’t actually care about flying drones over people or at night. Since Dec. 31, 2017, the FAA has received 4,837 requests from operators or companies wanted to operate at night — by far the most common waiver request received by the FAA.

Some drone operators have suggested that flying at night is actually safer, because collision lights make the drone easy to spot in the sky, and there is no sun in eyes to interfere with line of sight.

In order to fly at night, under the new proposal, pilots would have to simply a new “knowledge testing or training,” and they would have to ensure their drone has an anti-collision light illuminated and visible for at least 3 statute miles.

“We appreciate the FAA’s willingness to listen to the voices of people who use drones every day as they craft these necessary rules,” said Brendan Schulman, DJI Vice President of Policy & Legal Affairs in a prepared statement. “Given how vital these rules are for every professional drone pilot in America, it is surprising to see how few comments have been received.


  • Wow! It’s unbelievable how few people are commenting with an industry that is taking off so quickly. Maybe it has something to do with the sense that people already feel a lack of privacy with technology?

  • On the surface having rules that allow flying over people is really needed, BUT the proposed rules just won’t work. FAA relied on old research, instead of using the recent studies by the Alliance for System Safety of UAS through Research Excellence or ASSURE, as better solutions to the concerns raised by FAA.

    ASSURE has better solutions based on research of drones colliding with other objects, including cadavers.

    Also, FAA’s rules on flying over moving vehicles will be a disaster for UAM. Prohibiting drone flights over moving vehicles carries a significant cost to society due to delays by lane closure. The public also seems to be more willing to accept drone flights in urban environments. Infrastructure and regulations are already in place for accepted transportation corridors today.

  • Donald Henderson says:

    Hello, I’m a recreational licensed drone pilot and would very much like to see the rules open up for night flight and within reason the ability to fly over people. Thank you for your consideration.

  • Adrienne Snap says:

    Could the lack of comments be due to the length of the document? I appreciate the seriousness of the matter (as I did read the proposal), and Table 1 really helps with the break down, but it is still lengthy.

  • Florida law abiding citizen says:

    I fell over your informative article because I’m researching hovering drones at night over my remote country neighborhood. I can NOT see one thing positive or even a need for a drone to be be flying over my house/neighborrhood and hovering for hours almost every single night. The only thing that can come of this is theft, ID theft, extortion and blackmail.

    • Mr. Poopy Butthole says:

      Ugh….it’s always Florida. Look, even the best commercial drones can’t fly for hours over your house. They CAN NOT steal from you, extort you, blackmail you, or steal your ID. YOU are the exact type of person that needs to get yourself educated before opening your mouth. Stop spreading fear and paranoia.

Leave a Reply